Plaintiff - 1475 Words

after 10 years of service.† Caroline said, â€Å"I am sorry, but at this time there is nothing.† Then the Plaintiff requested, â€Å"Can I maybe go full time?† Caroline said, â€Å"Sorry. I can’t do that, because you have no future with our company, you will have to look elsewhere.† Plaintiff said, â€Å"I have the ability to take on more challenging work and move to the next level. I would like to take on more responsibilities in the department, because I have obtained qualifications and skills to do them.† Caroline said, â€Å"Due to the company’s situation with the merger and what Tony had told me about your communication and performance, I can’t help you at this time.† I said, â€Å"Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak with you. I hope that in the†¦show more content†¦Plaintiff felt it was unsafe to drive the car home in the condition it was in, so he then called his parents AAA to tow his car back home at 8:41 PM. Tow truck driver said the symptoms the Plaintiffs car could suggest a bad tank of gas. The Plaintiff has provided a copy of the tow truck receipt as evidence that the car was towed. SEE EXHIBIT â€Å"50† 3/30/17 AAA Tow Receipt. Upon inspection, the Plaintiff discovered that the timing belt tensioner was loosened, fluids in the gas tank was clear and engine oil was low. After the Plaintiff recently graduated college, his cars were continually broken into and vandalized on Charter Communications property. Charter Communications violated company policy when they failed to protect the Plaintiffs property and permitted the car vandalisms to continuously occur. Also, the local Irwindale Police Department ignored the Plaintiffs complaints because Charter Communications was unwilling to investigate the Plaintiffs claims. SEE EXHIBIT â€Å"9† Old Employee Handbook pg 99. Suspicious Cars Stalk Plaintiffs Home 42. Every once in a while, suspicious cars with dark windows were parked in the driveway blocking the Plaintiffs driveway at home. Sometimes, these suspicious cars were parked there in the morning or the day, but most of the time they were there after dark.. This suspicious activity has made the Plaintiffs family very scared of their safety, especially after the car vandalisms that had occurred at the PlaintiffsShow MoreRelatedPlaintiff Complains And For Causes Of Action Alleges858 Words   |  4 Pages Plaintiff complains and for causes of action alleges as follows:   Joeli Rosario is and has been a resident of the City of San Francisco, County of San Francisco. Her current address is: 1418, South Van Ness Avenue. The Connie’s Costume Shop is a sole proprietorship organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with its principal office located at 1685 Bryant Street, San Francisco, CA 941103.   Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued asRead More1.The Plaintiffs Have Suffered Physical And Financial Loss1561 Words   |  7 Pages 1. The Plaintiffs have suffered physical and financial loss in relation to the following properties: (a) Onehunga property (‘Onehunga’) (b) Herne Bay villa (‘Herne Bay’) 2. The unlawful actions and omissions of each of the Defendants have caused that loss. 3. The First Defendant is sued for his conduct as the Plaintiffs’ real estate agent in connection with an agreement for the sale of the Onehunga property from the Plaintiffs to Hugh’s Property Portfolio Limited, and the Herne Bay agreementRead MorePlaintiff Summary1688 Words   |  7 Pages7. Deny: we had permits from the city and inspectors came out and approved that our Property did comply with the city’s codes and regulations. 12. Neither admit nor deny: the Plaintiff stated that he â€Å"†¦discovered on the County of San Joaquin website that a construction case was filed against†¦Ã¢â‚¬  him but we are not sure how exactly he made this effort if the City of Stockton had not given him any notices. 13. Deny: we finished all construction and did competently close out the permits. 14. Deny: weRead MoreThe Plaintiffs Medical Doctors911 Words   |  4 PagesFACTS: The plaintiffs, A. V. Blount, Jr., Walter J. Hughes, Norman N. Jones, Girardeau Alexander, E. C. Noel, III, and F. E. Davis, are medical doctors (practitioners) licensed to practice and practicing medicine in the City of Greensboro, North Carolina. The plaintiffs, George C. Simkins, Jr., Milton Barnes and W. L. T. Miller, are dentists (practitioners) licensed to practice and practicing dentistry in the City of Greensboro, North Carolina. These plaintiffs-practitioners, are all citizens andRead MoreWho Is The Plaintiff?1835 Words   |  8 PagesWho is the plaintiff? There are three cases highlighted in this snippet of a long and drawn out court battle. (Does the group agree that there are 3 separate cases?) Case Number 2D01-1836: Re: Guardianship of Theresa (Terri) Marie Schiavo Case Number 2D01-1891: Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler (patient’s parents) are the plaintiff. Case Number 2D00-1269: Michael Schiavo (patient’s husband and guardian) is the plaintiff. The defendant? Case Number 2D01-1836: Re: Guardianship of TheresaRead MoreThe Option Of Mediation, Arbitration, And Negotiation1748 Words   |  7 Pagesweighed, the best option for the After Grocers Inc. is to resolve the situation using litigation. The option of mediation, arbitration, and negotiation was dismissed due to the fact in which the plaintiff, â€Å"seeks to harm their opponents†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (When to Use Mediation, 2013) processed from the possibility that the plaintiff is mad, which is inferred by the tone of the initial response of the husband. That can cause truly lengthy negotiations and highly frustrating mediations. Arbitration could be a viable solutionRead MoreThe Case Of The Lawsuit820 Words   |  4 PagesCourt has held that merely omitting a potentially liable party does not rise to the level of a mistake for the purposes of 15(c). This Court should distinguish between true mistakes in identity and tactical mistakes concerning who to sue. If a plaintiff is aware of t he identity and involvement of other actors, but chooses not to include them in the original complaint then there is likely not a mistake. The nature of the complaint also matters. If a complaint shows a clear intent to include a partyRead MoreCyber And Or Internet Laws1432 Words   |  6 Pagesbrought by five lead plaintiffs. The plaintiffs purchased their computers from the Dell website, the computers which they ordered contained Pentium 4 microprocessors, according to the defendant that was the fastest, most powerful Intel Pentium processor available; but the plaintiffs asserted the defendants representation was false, because the Pentium 4 microprocessor was slower and less powerful than either a Pentium 3 or AMD Athlon processors, but more expensive. The plaintiffs’ complaints were DellRead MoreAffirmative Defense Essay1014 Words   |  5 Pageslimitation has expired for filing this auto accident claim for negligence, the Plaintiff is more than 50% negligent in his own injuries, therefore, modified comparative negligence, further, the plaintiff failed to wear protective headgear as is required in his resident state of Missouri. 1. Negligence / Personal Injury - 2 Years with Modified Discovery Rule (knew or should have known injury was wrongfully caused even if plaintiff did not know it was actionable). (statutes of limitations). 2. IllinoisRead MoreCase Analysis Of L And V Contractors, Llc V. Heritage Warranty Insurance Risk Retention Group1044 Words   |  5 Pagescase of L and V Contractors, LLC v. Heritage Warranty Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc., et al the vehicle owner and plaintiff, Alejandro Leone sued AAMCO and Drive Train for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation and statutory theft. Claims were also bought against Heritage Insurance. The charges against the aforementioned defendants stem for the interactions the plaintiff had with each party. The following events lead to the case against the defendants. In 2002, Leone purchased a van with